Whilst we made the decision on what video to choose we had some concerns, because the song already ahs an orignal video however we were told this would not be a problem therefore we carried on with our decision and we as a group can proudly say have created and formed an amazing video.


As these two close-up shots show, we have put a lot of effort into making our shots sharp and not making amateur mistakes such as cropping off heads. Apart from this we felt the orignal was a very strong video which influenced us as a guide line. We took a lot of inspiration from it as it was also made by three teenagers and showed us how good our own video could be.
To begin planning we studied the original video as well as other influential videos and began brain storming. What makes this particular music video funny is its clever contrasts in mise en scene to lyrics and actions. Our costumes are suits and locations are in work environments, mainly an ICT class room, we also use props such as our TNB (The Midnight Beast) posters and screensavers yet this is all contrasted with our comedic lyrics with play on words ‘We can sit around and have a mass-debate’ (you can guess what the play on words is referring too) and dancing. Some of the other videos we looked at included the works of Tenacious D, a famous comedic rock band, and Fall Out Boy, an American group with a similar target audience to our own. We used some of their techniques to improve our own work, such as Tenacious D's clever use of costume to provoke a sense of humour in their videos.
From here Alex had sketched out some Story Boards to show the narrative of our video which would follow the shot types we could use. We had a basic idea of a 'house party' bulging out into the office, wilst pretending to be new political party, called the TMB party. I decided, as the video progressed and the party got wilder the shots should become more creative, therefore to represent this we started the video with more mid shots then later used more interesting shots such as an upwards crane.

Before directing the video we all decided to do some research on other directors and their approaches for ideas. Whilst researching we came across the Auteur Theory which is practised by many directors, such as Phil Harder who has directed music videos for the Foo Fighters and Prince. The theory clearly states the director should have full control over his production and give the final judgement on everything. However having done all of the research on this poticular theory we decided it would not be a good idea to approach this type of theory any more because we are a group of three, a team and therefore we should all make the decisions together.
Filming was a tough but rewarding experience, consisting lots of hard work, dedication and refilming certain types of shots however overall it was very rewarding to be able to be aprt of something so exciteing and enjoyable. As a person who can be quite shy of acting and singing, I preferred being behind the camera more than being infront of it however when it did come to times of being infront of it, i dealt with it and gathered some confidence to gain as much experience and courage out of this as possible so i wouldnt let my team down. Even though being behind and being infront of the camera are completely different, they do provide the same amount of effort and courage to provide 100% achievement. Being behind the camera gave us all the oportunity to look at the different shots and what needed to be refilmed and what needed tweeking.
We edited our video on Windows Moviemaker which admitedly, is not the best programme on the market but it got the job done. With its simple controls it was user friendly and didnt take long to get used too. In the ending process we was able to put together the shots we had filmed and added in transitions this took hours but we all feel the final product was worth the effort. In this sequence we managed to smoothly edit together a reverse angle shot to show the journey of me down the staircase.


One problem we did come across whilst filming the music video was the size of the cast, in the orignal video they had a big open plan office with lots of extras in the background featuring in the party scenes which we didnt have. However this did give us some positives outlooks because this made us work more closely together and we had similier ideas to share and portray. Overall I am extremely happy with how our final video turned out and I am greatful for all the hard work everyone put in.
In what ways does my media product use, develop or challenge froms and conventions of real media products?
Our music video follows the conventions of music videos and its genre in many ways, and then not so much in others. In relation to camera work we do follow the conventions as we use a variety of shots to show us the artists and to establish the location. In keeping with the genre, we use a close up with flashing lights during Liam's rap while he acts out the rap genre hand gestures.

Our Mise en Scene both follows the conventions of a music video and challenges them. We wear suits, as media theorist Richard Dyer said 'How we treat others is based on how we see them', and use work environments that complement each other, but then our actions such and dancing and the lyrics played are a stark contrast. This, as explained before, is to get our real world political message out to the young generation that will be effected. As we explored in my Star Analysis of Tenacious D, this technique has been used before in a music video but it is not the normality.
Our Lighting and Editing both follow the conventions of a music video. Our editing is fast using Jump Cuts and Quick Edits to fit in with the flow of our song. We also use some creative editing techniques to represent the party; these include the background morphing and upwards crane. The lighting is mostly natural but we also use synthetic lighting during our rap scene and all indoor conventional lighting.
Our sound is also conventional as we use our track and not natural sounds. There are examples of music videos having ‘movie’ style clips before or after the track that use other sounds, the most famous of these being Michael Jacksons’ ‘Thriller’.
How effective is the combination of my main text and ancillary text?
Alongside our Music Video we created a Digipak and Poster. From the beginning we knew we wanted to link all my work together to give it purpose and reliability. If we look at the syringe theory, my audience will be more inclined to view my work if it’s everywhere and all looking similar- artists thus frequently use signature aspects in all their work such as Michael Jackson and his single white glove. For my poster and Digipak we used an ongoing black and white and colour theme to represent the two mise en scene themes of my video: a serious political message and humour. For the inside covers of my Digipak we posed at the three political party leaders and imported those images onto the corresponding party colours. We think it’s important to keep this political message prominent throughout my work because that’s the key goal; to get this message out to the young people that can or soon will be able to vote.
What have I learnt from my audience feedback?
In my next post we explore audience feedback and the way media consumers might analysis my work; as there are many theories on how they could take it in. But how have we gone about questioning people to find their answers? 1st off the blog in publicly available on the internet and a large unknown audience may have seen my work, but for friends we specifically asked them to have a look and report back to me on how they felt. In class we also looked at each other’s work in a peer assessment exercise. What we learnt from this feedback was that my video received largely positive reviews, with my audience liking our up-beat tempo with complimenting edits and dancing and that they found the jokes funny. In class it was brought to my attention that the lip syncing was slightly out in places which we would definitely correct if given another opportunity.
How did I use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Research:
For initial research we went online to analyses professional Music Videos and Digipaks. Thanks to the age of Web2.0 this was a lot easier to do then it would have been ten years ago as we can watch videos on websites such as Youtube and look at Digipak’s on artists official websites.
Planning:
Planning was very paper based, making brainstorms and storyboards. Despite this I did take screen shots off the original video and uploaded them onto my blog to study their work.
Construction:
We used the most technologies for this section of my work. We filmed ourselves on the school video-recorders and uploaded the footage onto Windows Movie Maker. Using Windows Movie Maker was basic yet user friendly- consisting of dragging and cutting clips and then editing them together. While creating the Digipak we used Photoshop to add the background colours to our political poses and to get the black and white effect of out outer covers.
Evaluation:
My whole back-catalogue of work including this evaluation is on my blog; a relatively new media technology that just wouldn’t have been available a few years ago. It allows for people with internet access to view my media text and evaluate it for themselves, whether they’re involved in my course or not. We have evaluated each other’s work using the blogs and have become comfortable using media technologies.


